Scientific Investigations
Comparison of Adjustable and Fixed Oral Appliances for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
http://dx.doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.1300
Christopher J. Lettieri, M.D.1,2; Nathalie Paolino, D.O.3; Arn H. Eliasson, M.D.1,2; Anita A. Shah, D.O.2; Aaron B. Holley, M.D.1,2
1Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC; 2Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD; 3Department of Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
Study Objectives:
To compare the efficacy of adjustable and fixed oral appliances for the treatment of OSA.
Methods:
Retrospective review of consecutive patients with OSA treated with either adjustable or fixed oral appliances. Polysomnography was conducted before and during therapy. Effective treatment was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) < 5 events/h or < 10 events/h with resolution of sleepiness (Epworth < 10). We compared efficacy rates between fixed and adjustable appliances and sought to identify factors associated with greater success.
Results:
We included 805 patients, 602 (74.8%) treated with an adjustable and 203 (25.2%) a fixed oral appliances. Among the cohort, 86.4% were men; mean age was 41.3 ± 9.2 years. Mean AHI was 30.7 ± 25.6, with 34.1% having mild (AHI 5-14.9), 29.2% moderate (AHI 15-29.9), and 36.8% severe (AHI ≥ 30) OSA. Successful therapy was significantly more common with adjustable appliances. Obstructive events were reduced to < 5/h in 56.8% with adjustable compared to 47.0% with fixed appliances (p = 0.02). Similarly, a reduction of events to < 10 with resolution of sleepiness occurred in 66.4% with adjustable appliances versus 44.9% with fixed appliances (p < 0.001). For both devices, success was more common in younger patients, with lower BMI and less severe disease.
Conclusions:
Adjustable devices produced greater reductions in obstructive events and were more likely to provide successful therapy, especially in moderate-severe OSA. Fixed appliances were effective in mild disease, but were less successful in those with higher AHIs. Given these findings, the baseline AHI should be considered when selecting the type of oral appliance.
Citation:
Lettieri CJ; Paolino N; Eliasson AH; Shah AA; Holley AB. Comparison of adjustable and fixed oral appliances for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med 2011;7(5):439-445.
Please login to continue reading the full article
Subscribers to JCSM get full access to current and past issues of the JCSM.
Login to JCSM
Not a subscriber?
Join the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and receive a subscription to JCSM with your membership