ADVERTISEMENT

Issue Navigator

Volume 10 No. 06
Earn CME
Accepted Papers
Classifieds







Scientific Investigations

Validation of Two Depression Screening Instruments in a Sleep Disorders Clinic

http://dx.doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.3802

Mandy Law, M.B.B.S., B.Med.Sc.(Hons)1; Matthew T. Naughton, M.B.B.S., M.D.1; Arup Dhar, M.B.B.Ch., B.A.O., B.Med.Sc.2; David Barton, M.B.B.S., Ph.D.2; Eli Dabscheck, M.B.B.S., M. Clin. Epi.1
1Alfred Hospital & Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; 2Baker IDI Heart & Diabetes Institute, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia

Study Objectives:

Depression is a commonly diagnosed comorbidity in sleep disorder clinics. However, screening instruments for major depressive episode (MDE) have not been validated in this setting. We aimed to validate the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Beck Depression Inventory – Fast Screen (BDI-FS) with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) in patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Design:

Cross-sectional study.

Setting:

Academic center.

Participants:

One hundred one new patients with a clinical suspicion of OSA, as assessed by a sleep physician.

Measurements:

MDE, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and panic disorder (PD) were assessed by (1) a diagnostic interview utilizing the MINI and (2) by two self-report questionnaires: HADS and BDI-FS. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was undertaken to assess which HADS and BDI-FS threshold yielded the highest correlation for a diagnosis of MDE and/or GAD/PD as assessed with an interview conducted using the MINI.

Results:

A HADS-Depression score ≥ 8 gave optimal sensitivity (83.1%) and specificity (83.3%) with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.851 for predicting the diagnosis of MDE. A HADS-Anxiety score ≥ 11 gave an optimal sensitivity (93.1%) and specificity (84.7%) with an AUC 0.911 for predicting the diagnosis of GAD/PD. A BDI-FS threshold ≥ 6 gave optimal sensitivity (86.7%) and specificity (82.9%) with an AUC 0.897 for MDE.

Conclusion:

The HADS and BDI-FS are accurate screening instruments with high concurrent validity for identifying the probability of a patient having MDE and—in the case of HADS—GAD and PD disorder in a sleep disorders clinic.

Citation:

Law M, Naughton MT, Dhar A, Barton D, Dabscheck E. Validation of two depression screening instruments in a sleep disorders clinic. J Clin Sleep Med 2014;10(6):683-688.




Please login to continue reading the full article

Subscribers to JCSM get full access to current and past issues of the JCSM.

Login to JCSM

Not a subscriber?

Join the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and receive a subscription to JCSM with your membership