ADVERTISEMENT

Issue Navigator

Volume 09 No. 02
Earn CME
Accepted Papers
Classifieds







Review Articles

Effect of Oral Appliances on Blood Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

http://dx.doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.2420

Imran H. Iftikhar, M.D.1; Erin Rikard Hays, M.D.1; Michelle-Anne Iverson, D.O.1; Ulysses J. Magalang, M.D.3; Andrea Kay Maas, M.D.2
1University of South Carolina, School of Medicine, Columbia, SC; 2The William Jennings Bryan Dorn Veterans Affairs Hospital and University of South Carolina, School of Medicine, Columbia, SC; 3The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

Background:

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent risk factor for the development of hypertension. However the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on lowering systemic blood pressure (BP) in OSA patients has been conflicting. Oral appliance (OA) therapy is an important alternative therapy to CPAP for patients with mild to moderate OSA.

Objective:

To conduct a meta-analysis of studies which have evaluated the effect of OAs on BP in patients with OSA.

Data Sources:

Studies were retrieved by searching PubMed (all studies that were published until December 15, 2011)

Study Selection:

Three independent reviewers screened citations to identify trials of the effect of OA on BP.

Data Extraction:

Data from observational and randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies was extracted for pre- and post-treatment systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure (SBP, DBP, and MAP).

Data Synthesis:

A total of 7 studies that enrolled 399 participants met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate of mean changes and the corresponding 95% CIs for SBP, DBP, and MAP from each trial are −2.7 mm Hg (95% CI: −0.8 to −4.6), p-value 0.04; −2.7 mm Hg (95% CI: −0.9 to −4.6), p-value 0.004; and −2.40 mm Hg (95% CI: −4.01 to −0.80), p-value 0.003 (Figures 24). The pooled estimate of mean changes and the corresponding 95% CIs for nocturnal SBP, DBP, and MAP from each trial are −2.0 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.1 to −5.3), p-value 0.212; −1.7 mm Hg (95% CI: −0.1 to −3.2), p-value 0.03; and −1.9 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.3 to −5.1), p-value 0.255 (Figures 57) respectively.

Conclusions:

The pooled estimate shows a favorable effect of OAs on SBP, MAP, and DBP. Most of the studies were observational. Therefore, more RCTs are warranted involving a larger number of patients and longer treatment periods to confirm the effects of OA on BP.

Citation:

Iftikhar IH; Hays ER; Iverson MA; Magalang UJ; Maas AK. Effect of oral appliances on blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med 2013;9(2):165–174.




Please login to continue reading the full article

Subscribers to JCSM get full access to current and past issues of the JCSM.

Login to JCSM

Not a subscriber?

Join the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and receive a subscription to JCSM with your membership