ADVERTISEMENT

Issue Navigator

Volume 10 No. 07
Earn CME
Accepted Papers
Classifieds







Scientific Investigations

Development and Evaluation of a Measure to Assess Restorative Sleep

http://dx.doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.3860

Christopher L. Drake, Ph.D.1; Ron D. Hays, Ph.D.2; Robert Morlock, Ph.D.1; Fong Wang, M.D.3; Richard Shikiar, Ph.D.4; Lori Frank, Ph.D.5; Ralph Downey, Ph.D.6; Thomas Roth, Ph.D.1
1Sleep Disorders & Research Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI; 2University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; 3Medivation Inc, San Francisco, CA; 4Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Seattle, WA; 5MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, MD; 6Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA

Background:

There are validated measures assessing insomnia and disturbed sleep, but few psychometrically sound instruments to assess perceptions of the restorative or inadequate properties of sleep are available.

Study Objectives:

To develop and evaluate a new instrument, the Restorative Sleep Questionnaire (RSQ).

Design and Setting:

Focus groups were conducted using participants with and without nonrestorative sleep complaints. Questions were designed to elicit the feelings and experiences people have about their sleep and their view of daytime consequences of sleep. Expert panels confirmed the importance of nonrestorative sleep (NRS) as a frequently encountered problem either with or without other sleep complaints. The resulting RSQ was administered in three studies: (1) a telephone interview with healthy controls and individuals with sleep problems; (2) a randomized clinical trial of patients with primary insomnia assessed by polysomnography (PSG); (3) a PSG study of subjects with NRS complaints.

Measurement and Results:

Across all studies, the new measures were shown to be significantly correlated with health-related quality of life (HRQL) domains hypothesized to be related to NRS. The RSQ had good psychometric properties (α > 0.90; rtest-retest > 0.80), and factor analysis confirmed the unidimensionality of the measure. The RSQ was able to distinguish between healthy controls, patients with primary insomnia, and insomnia patients with isolated NRS complaints but without PSG defined sleep onset, duration, or maintenance problems. Normal sleepers reported sleep that was about a standard deviation more restorative than that of those with NRS on the RSQ.

Conclusions:

The results of the study provide support for the reliability and validity of the RSQ as a measure of NRS in subjects with and without self-reported or PSG confirmed sleep initiation and maintenance difficulties.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers:

NCT00655369; NCT00705601

Citation:

Drake CL, Hays RD, Morlock R, Wang F, Shikiar R, Frank L, Downey R, Roth T. Development and evaluation of a measure to assess restorative sleep. J Clin Sleep Med 2014;10(7):733-741.




Please login to continue reading the full article

Subscribers to JCSM get full access to current and past issues of the JCSM.

Login to JCSM

Not a subscriber?

Join the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and receive a subscription to JCSM with your membership