ADVERTISEMENT

Issue Navigator

Volume 10 No. 08
Earn CME
Accepted Papers
Classifieds







Scientific Investigations

The Efficacy of a Chinstrap in Treating Sleep Disordered Breathing and Snoring

http://dx.doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.3962

Sushanth Bhat, M.D.1; Neola Gushway-Henry, M.D.1; Peter G. Polos, M.D., Ph.D.1; Vincent A. DeBari, Ph.D.2; Sandeep Riar, M.D.3; Divya Gupta, M.D., F.A.A.S.M.1; Liudmila Lysenko, M.D.4; Disha Patel, M.D.1; Justin Pi, M.D.5; Sudhansu Chokroverty, M.D., F.A.A.S.M.1
1NJ Neuroscience Institute at JFK Medical Center/Seton Hall University, Edison NJ; ; 2Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, NJ; ; 3JFK Medical Center, Edison, NJ; ; 4Ochsner Health Systems, New Orleans, LA; ; 5Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack NJ

Study Objectives:

A previously published case report suggested that a chinstrap alone might improve obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We conducted this study to determine whether a chinstrap was a feasible alternative to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with OSA.

Methods:

26 adult patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] > 5/h on diagnostic polysomnogram [PSG]) underwent a modified split-night PSG, using only a chinstrap for the first 2 hours of sleep, followed by CPAP titration for the remainder of the night. Improvements in AHI, arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), and snoring with chinstrap use were compared to results with optimal CPAP pressures.

Results:

There was no significant difference between the diagnostic PSG and the chinstrap portion of the split-night PSG in the following parameters: general AHI (median [IQR] 16.0/h [9.7-26.0] vs. 25.9/h [10.7-42.7]), SpO2 nadir (84.0% [80.5-87.5] vs. 87.0 [84.0-88.5]), AHI in REM sleep (26.7/h [16.8-43.7] vs. 42.4/h [21.3-57.7]), AHI in supine sleep (24.9/h [11.9-51.5] vs. 29.8/h [11.7-55.5]), snoring index (253.2/h [147.5-353.1] vs. 180.0/h [9.8-393.3]) or subjective snoring scale (3.0 [0.8-3.0] vs. 2.5 [0.4-3.0]). The AHI and SpO2 nadir in the 13 patients with mild OSA also did not improve with chinstrap use (9.6/h [8.1-12.2] vs. 10.6/h [6.8-35.4] and 87.0% [83.0-90.0] vs. 88.0% [87.0-89.0]). All these parameters showed significant improvement with optimal CPAP titration (p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

A chinstrap alone is not an effective treatment for OSA. It does not improve sleep disordered breathing, even in mild OSA, nor does it improve the AHI in REM sleep or supine sleep. It is also ineffective in improving snoring.

Citation:

Bhat S, Gushway-Henry N, Polos PG, DeBari VA, Riar S, Gupta D, Lysenko L, Patel D, Pi J, Chokroverty S. The efficacy of a chinstrap in treating sleep disordered breathing and snoring. J Clin Sleep Med 2014;10(8):887-892.




Please login to continue reading the full article

Subscribers to JCSM get full access to current and past issues of the JCSM.

Login to JCSM

Not a subscriber?

Join the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and receive a subscription to JCSM with your membership